Event Description
Join PILPG and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP on March 22 at 12:00 pm ET for an expert roundtable on the feasibility of establishing a single residual mechanism for international criminal tribunals.
Since the end of World War II, the international community has periodically sought to provide some degree of justice, and some sense of closure, to societies impacted by war. This is often done through the establishment of temporary criminal tribunals, which operate either under international law or under a hybrid model that blends international law with the domestic law of the country where the conflict arose. Because many of the tribunals’ other functions and responsibilities continue past the conclusion of these prosecutions, international and hybrid criminal tribunals transition at some point from full-fledged courts into residual mechanisms, which in practice is a complex process.
This Roundtable will focus on the feasibility of establishing a single consolidated residual mechanism for all or multiple international/hybrid tribunals, by discussing the legal and practical issues associated with such consolidation. During this Roundtable, the experts will share their insights and will discuss the feasibility of this idea. This roundtable will be moderated by PILPG Managing Director Professor Milena Sterio.
This is part of the PILPG Thought Leadership Initiative. The Initiative focuses on prominent international law and international affairs topics and organizes monthly expert roundtables to share expertise and reflections from our work on peace negotiations, post-conflict constitution drafting, and war crimes prosecution.
Speakers
MODERATOR
Milena Sterio is the Managing Director of PILPG and the Charles R. Emrick Jr. - Calfee Halter & Griswold Professor of Law at Cleveland State University’s Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. She is a leading expert on international law, international criminal law and human rights. Sterio leads PILPG’s Thought Leadership Initiative.
Sterio is one of six permanent editors of the prestigious IntLawGrrls blog, and a frequent contributor to the blog focused on international law, policy and practice. In the spring of 2013, Sterio was selected as a Fulbright Scholar, spending the semester in Baku, Azerbaijan, at Baku State University. While in Baku, she had the opportunity to teach and conduct research on secession issues under international law related to the province of Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh. Serving as a maritime piracy law expert, she has participated in meetings of the United Nations Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia as well as in the work of the United Nations Global Counterterrorism Forum. Sterio has also assisted piracy prosecutions in Mauritius, Kenya and the Seychelles Islands. Sterio is a graduate of Cornell Law School and the University of Paris I, and was an associate in the New York City firm of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton before joining the ranks of academia full time. She has published seven books and numerous law review articles. Her latest book, “The Syrian Conflict’s Impact on International Law,” (co-authored with Paul Williams and Michael Scharf) was published by Cambridge University Press in 2020.
PILPG White Paper: Blueprint for a single residual mechanism for international criminal tribunals
Recognizing the need to evolve the efforts of fulfilling residual responsibilities of international criminal tribunals, Public International Law & Policy Group (PILPG), in collaboration with Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, embarked on a project to investigate the possibility of establishing a unified, permanent residual mechanism for the ongoing responsibilities of current and future tribunals. The resulting White Paper, details the legal and political feasibility of a permanent single-residual mechanism. Click on the image to the right to access the White Paper.
Just Security Symposium on the Creation of a Single Residual Mechanism for Atrocity Crimes
Introduction to the Symposium.
The Symposium is composed of three parts:
Part I introduces the idea of a single residual mechanism, contextualizing it within a broader framework and history of international criminal justice. It examines the functions of residual mechanisms generally, then outlines in greater detail the benefits and challenges to creating a single residual mechanism.
Part II addresses the primary legal, political, and administrative considerations surrounding the creation of a single residual mechanism, as well as how related challenges might be addressed.
Finally, Part III introduces three possible distinct structural models for a single residual mechanism, each of which would encompass a different scope of functions and be created through a different legal mechanism, while also examining the costs and benefits of each model.