Expert Roundtable:
Civil Society Documentation
Privacy and Security Obligations for Documenters
Event Description
In our previous Civil Society Documentation Roundtable Series event, we discussed using technology for documentation and how it is used and analyzed by courts for accountability purposes, exploring the relationship between documenters and the information they collect being used in international courts. During this roundtable, co-sponsored by Orrick, we discussed how documenters that use digital databases to store digital information protect the sensitive details that victims and witnesses provide to them. Further, how do these obligations differ when using a digital database in place of paper questionnaires, and do the benefits of using these technologies outweigh the additional responsibilities that come with them? We gathered an expert panel to share documenters’ legal responsibilities that come with using digital databases, and of documenters and tool developers who work with these technologies on a regular basis. We hoped to answer, Who owns the data? Where is it stored? How is it protected? Is it still worth using?
This event is part of the PILPG Thought Leadership Initiative. The Initiative focuses on prominent international law and international affairs topics and organizes monthly expert roundtables to share expertise and reflections from our work on peace negotiations, post-conflict constitution drafting, and war crimes prosecution.
This event marked Part II of PILPG’s 2022 Civil Society Documentation Roundtable Series. Part I, which took place on January 21, 2022, focused on the subject of The Use of Digital Evidence in International Courts. International courts are increasingly being faced with questions on how to evaluate admissibility and weight of digital evidence of atrocity crimes collected by mechanism investigators and civil society documenters. How do chain of custody requirements have to evolve to accommodate new ways of collecting data? Why should they evolve? Furthermore, what is the value of digital databases and why do documenters all over the world increasingly rely on digital data collection tools for their work? Join our experts to discuss these pertinent issues facing the international legal community as they explore the benefits and challenges that digital data collection presents to international courts.
SpeakerS
MODERATOR
Milena Sterio, the Charles R. Emrick Jr. - Calfee Halter & Griswold Professor of Law at Cleveland State University’s Cleveland-Marshall College of Law and Managing Director at PILPG is a leading expert on international law, international criminal law and human rights. Sterio is one of six permanent editors of the prestigious IntLawGrrls blog, and a frequent contributor to the blog focused on international law, policy and practice. In the spring of 2013, Sterio was selected as a Fulbright Scholar, spending the semester in Baku, Azerbaijan, at Baku State University. While in Baku, she had the opportunity to teach and conduct research on secession issues under international law related to the province of Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh. Serving as a maritime piracy law expert, she has participated in meetings of the United Nations Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia as well as in the work of the United Nations Global Counterterrorism Forum. Sterio has also assisted piracy prosecutions in Mauritius, Kenya and the Seychelles Islands. Sterio is a graduate of Cornell Law School and the University of Paris I, and was an associate in the New York City firm of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton before joining the ranks of academia full time. She has published seven books and numerous law review articles. Her latest book, “The Syrian Conflict’s Impact on International Law,” (co-authored with Paul Williams and Michael Scharf) was published by Cambridge University Press in 2020.